<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groucho Marx versus Market Suicidalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2007/11/29/groucho-marx-on-market-suicidalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2007/11/29/groucho-marx-on-market-suicidalism/</link>
	<description>Another Fine Edition of Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phila</title>
		<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2007/11/29/groucho-marx-on-market-suicidalism/comment-page-1/#comment-10295</link>
		<dc:creator>Phila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2007/11/29/groucho-marx-on-market-suicidalism/#comment-10295</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;One obvious rejoinder to Kayâ€™s Hayekian view of the market as a source of reliable information about preferences is that there are interests which cannot be expressed through decisions in the market, but only through other forms of decision making (e.g. decentralised democratic politics).&lt;/i&gt;

And even if these interests could be expressed through the market, to the extent that Kay&#039;s view is seen as normative, they probably won&#039;t be. Intergenerational equity will always be the &quot;wrong&quot; preference, by definition.

&lt;i&gt;We might even say that this excess of our relationships over their marketisation is arguably a â€˜measureâ€™ of well-being.&lt;/i&gt;

We might indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>One obvious rejoinder to Kayâ€™s Hayekian view of the market as a source of reliable information about preferences is that there are interests which cannot be expressed through decisions in the market, but only through other forms of decision making (e.g. decentralised democratic politics).</i></p>
<p>And even if these interests could be expressed through the market, to the extent that Kay&#8217;s view is seen as normative, they probably won&#8217;t be. Intergenerational equity will always be the &#8220;wrong&#8221; preference, by definition.</p>
<p><i>We might even say that this excess of our relationships over their marketisation is arguably a â€˜measureâ€™ of well-being.</i></p>
<p>We might indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
