<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Evasions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/</link>
	<description>Another Fine Edition of Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:55:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rochenko</title>
		<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>It\&#039;s a start. We\&#039;d need some kind of institution to make it happen, and perhaps to watch over the waste sites too.  And cash to fund it.  A bequest which, overall, begins to look worryingly like Torchwood or the vision of the early nuclear scientists of a \&#039;priesthood\&#039; of technologists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It\&#8217;s a start. We\&#8217;d need some kind of institution to make it happen, and perhaps to watch over the waste sites too.  And cash to fund it.  A bequest which, overall, begins to look worryingly like Torchwood or the vision of the early nuclear scientists of a \&#8217;priesthood\&#8217; of technologists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Saussure</title>
		<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Saussure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;How will we ensure that they [instructions on how to access the waste and deal with any problems] are still readable, given the mutability of language?&lt;/em&gt;

Preface them with a request that they be re-written every 30 years or so?   Just a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>How will we ensure that they [instructions on how to access the waste and deal with any problems] are still readable, given the mutability of language?</em></p>
<p>Preface them with a request that they be re-written every 30 years or so?   Just a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochenko</title>
		<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, that too.  I keep forgetting to mention it because it ought to be so obvious.  Although the Indian nuclear programme is looking to thorium-fuelled reactors now, of which there\&#039;s perhaps 3x as much available as uranium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, that too.  I keep forgetting to mention it because it ought to be so obvious.  Although the Indian nuclear programme is looking to thorium-fuelled reactors now, of which there\&#8217;s perhaps 3x as much available as uranium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokewriting.co.uk/2006/10/20/nuclear-evasions/#comment-770</guid>
		<description>And also, nobody seems to be asking about the finite nature of uranium reserves. Reserves that, at current consumption, could be gone by the end of the century - and that consumption is only going to increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also, nobody seems to be asking about the finite nature of uranium reserves. Reserves that, at current consumption, could be gone by the end of the century &#8211; and that consumption is only going to increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
